Mothra vs Godzilla

Mothra vs Godzilla (1964)
Toho Studios
Director: Honda Ishirō, Tsuburaya Eiji (special effects)
Also known as: Godzilla vs The Thing, the title first given to the film in US cinemas.


I suggested that King Kong vs Godzilla (1962) wasn’t what we might think of as “a Godzilla movie”, more like an opportunistic one-off occasioned by Toho acquiring the rights to King Kong. It was, however, a massive commercial success and of course Toho wanted to capitalise on it. Somehow they weren’t able to mount a rematch between Kong and Godzilla – they weren’t done with Kong, as we’ll see in due course, but on this occasion it didn’t work out. But they were willing to take another chance on Godzilla, and they had other kaiju at their disposal, kaiju that they already owned the rights to. Mothra (1961) had been hugely successful too, and so the studio set about blending both films to create their next blockbuster.

This is the film that really establishes the Godzilla franchise. There are much closer ties between it and the couple of films that will follow it than there are between the various other Shōwa era Godzilla films. More than that, this is where the Godzilla vs Monster template really takes hold. King Kong vs Godzilla established the format with a clash of kaiju celebrities as its focus – in its title, even – and a big monster fight at the climax, but now we’ve seen Godzilla paired with another Toho kaiju. Now we have an honest-to-goodness crossover, hinting at the possibility that all Toho’s monsters might inhabit the same narrative world. That’s the way things are going to be from now on.

As part of the world-building for this burgeoning shared universe, we get lovely touches like public announcements warning of an imminent kaiju attack ("Go to your shelters!"). The events of Mothra aren’t discussed – in fact, Mothra vs Godzilla reprises elements of the earlier film but behaves as if they’re new. When the shady businessmen talk about exploiting the Shobijin by putting them on the stage, no one remarks that it’s been tried before, or that it ended badly. No one seems particularly startled by the Shobijin or any of the developments around Mothra, yet no one at any time says "Mothra? You mean like that creature that attacked Japan just three years ago?" It’s assumed that we’ll already know what we need to know about the kaiju, and so the characters implicitly already know it too, even if we’re treating the story as brand new. That’s something else that will become standard in these films.

The other thing that starts to happen here is that Godzilla starts to shift from being a merely physical creature, one of a mostly unseen species, towards being a unitary entity, sole bearer of the name Godzilla and something nearer the supernatural. The inclusion of Mothra is probably a factor – maybe some of her weird god-kaiju energy rubs off on him. Rodan might have been a more obvious opponent for Godzilla since they’re both saurian beasts. We saw more than one Rodan in Rodan (1956) and none of them survived, but as we know (as this point) that Rodan isn’t a one-off, there’s no bar against having another one pop up. Remember that the Godzilla in this film isn’t the same as the first one, after all, and might not be the second one either. Going down that road would have reinforced the idea of these kaiju as straightforwardly physical animals. Instead the creative team went with Mothra, who survived her previous movie appearance, is worshipped as a god and apparently reincarnates as each successive version of the kaiju we see. In order to make more sense of later films, we’re increasingly going to have to assume that something similar applies to other daikaiju.

I meant to dive into this in the King Kong vs Godzilla entry, on the basis that its blandly materialist American re-edit offers a strong point of contrast, but this entry works too. There’s a wide variety of types of supernatural being in Japanese folklore, largely thanks to Japan’s animist Shinto belief system. Rather than spend time defining them all here, I’ll link to a helpful page on the Shinto Sanctuary website that explains some of the terms. “Kaiju” isn’t one of them – it just means “weird beast” and it’s applicable to non-supernatural American creature feature critters as well as Mothra. The two principal terms in play are “kami” and “yōkai”, and while these might broadly be translated as “god” and “monster” or “demon”, the distinction between them isn’t as clearly defined as that. Shinto Sanctuary suggests that the key difference is that if it’s malevolent, it’s a yōkai, but that doesn’t seem to work in all cases either. Another definition I’ve seen online suggests that yōkai exist because of human activity in a way that kami don’t.

Mothra, I think, looks like a kami or at least (in line with what Shinto Sanctuary says on the subject) the animal avatar of a kami. She has protective ties to a specific place and will, over the course of her film appearances, increasingly take on the role of a guardian of the natural world. Based on what little evidence we have, it looks more likely that she predates the human occupation of Infant Island than that she owes her existence to her worshippers (although perhaps the belief of the Infant Islanders has influenced the appearance of the Shobijin).

We might recall that Godzilla was once worshipped by the people of Ōdo Island, or at least by their ancestors, who reportedly used to sacrifice young women to him in return for better fishing. On the other hand, he owes his existence as we know it to human activity and is malevolent (in his first few films, although he’ll soon soften), so perhaps he’s a yōkai. Perhaps he attacks Japan not because he’s been woken up by nuclear tests and is feeling grumpy, but because it’s his job to visit supernatural vengeance upon presumptuous humanity. Perhaps Dr Yamane’s rational explanation of his existence was only ever a thin veneer.

And then again, even if he is some sort of actual dinosaur, we might fairly say he’s either several million years out of time or extremely long-lived. He may not be a “tsukumogami” (a domestic object that’s become a yōkai after a century of existence), but perhaps a similar principle applies – he’s transcended normal biology through sheer longevity. That’s also true in a real-world sense, of course – the more films he’s appeared in and the longer he’s stuck around, the less explicable he’s become.

We’re getting a little ahead of ourselves. Apart from the freaky way he makes his entrance in this movie, there’s not too much here that hints at Godzilla being more than just a big, angry, celebrity lizard. But this shift I’ve mentioned will happen subtly over the next couple of movies, in little background details, in the way the human characters (and I suppose I really mean the scriptwriters) talk and think about Godzilla. Keep an eye out for that.

This film is well loved by Godzilla fans, and I think that’s largely a matter of familiarity. The shape of the plot is broadly that of King Kong vs Godzilla, with the details of Mothra grafted on top – the exploitative entrepreneur is an element both earlier films had in common, which speaks to the debt Mothra already owed to King Kong (1933). Needless to say, many familiar faces from the Toho repertory company show up here too. Koizumi Hiroshi, who starred as the affable Professor Chūjō in Mothra, here plays Professor Miura, a completely different scientist and not at all to be confused with his earlier role. Takarada Akira, previously the rather wet Prince Wakatarashi in The Three Treasures (1959), is now the heroic journalist Sakai. Tazaki Jun, who played the JSDF General in King Kong vs Godzilla, plays Sakai's editor. Fujiki Yu, one of the two ad men from Pacific Pharma in King Kong vs Godzilla, gives another comic turn here in a secondary role as the egg-obsessed reporter Nakamura. Sahara Kenji, the romantic male lead in Rodan and King Kong vs Godzilla, gives a surprising turn as the villainous financier Torohata. His partner in crime, the unscrupulous businessman Kumayama, is played by Tajima Yoshifumi, most recently seen as the captain of the expeditionary ship in King Kong vs Godzilla and to be found in secondary roles throughout the Shōwa era. Omura Senkichi, the Faro Islander guide Konno in King Kong vs Godzilla, can be briefly seen in a crowd scene of fishermen demanding payment from Kumayama. Hoshi Yuriko, who plays the photographer Nakanishi Junko, is new to the series but will reappear as a completely different journalist in the next Godzilla movie.

In places, it looks like this film isn't just re-running the formula and ending of King Kong vs Godzilla only with two Japanese monsters, but trying to repeat its comedic tone as well. There’s Godzilla’s buffoonery in his first couple of scenes and the way the reporter Nakamura keeps producing and eating boiled eggs while everyone else is talking about Mothra's egg. These attempts at comedy are more laboured than anything in King Kong vs Godzilla. Probably not meant to be funny but also not helping are the kaiju fight scenes. Special effects director Tsuburaya evidently hasn’t yet settled on the idea of overcranking the camera to slow down the action and make the daikaiju look bigger and weightier – here the camera is instead undercranked, which speeds the fight scenes up and makes them look like something in the style of Benny Hill.

The other effects shots are a lot better, particularly the composites involving the kaiju or the Shobijin and human actors. There’s a great miniature storm at the start of the film. The obvious initial painting of Mothra’s egg on the beach (possibly either a matte or a glass shot) gives way to a practical egg in the next shot that matches it perfectly. And the crew certainly know how to work a shot of Godzilla emerging from behind a hill. I get strangely mixed intentions from some shots in which Godzilla appears blurred - to give an impression of distance? - while the models around him appear in crisp focus, but overall, it’s good stuff. What really lets this film down, apart from the farcical fight scenes, is the way plot threads are set up and abandoned or barely developed - the property development story that dominates the opening and the schoolchildren in danger near the end disappear completely from the film's denouement.

No comments:

Post a Comment