Godzilla

Godzilla (1954)
Toho Studios
Directors: Honda Ishirō, Tsuburaya Eiji (special effects)

Also discussed: The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953). Or, to give it its full title from the cinematic trailer: The Beast, the Beast, the Beast, the Beast from 20,000 Fathoms!

Not also discussed: Godzilla, King of the Monsters! (1956). Bear with me, we’ll come back to that another time. This post will refer to a specific additional source, however: Jeffrey Angles' 2023 translation, with afterword, of Kayama Shigeru's 1955 novelisations of his scripts for the first two Godzilla movies.


Picture it: Sicily, 1922.

I'm sorry, I was briefly possessed by the spirit of Estelle Getty there. Let's try that again.

Picture it: Tokyo, 1954. Two years since the post-war American occupation of Japan ended, except for Iwo Jima and Okinawa which the United States would hold onto for another decade and a half, plus all the US troops still stationed in Japan. The Japanese public's relationship with all things American was... complicated. On the one hand, resentment over the occupation and the terms under which it officially ended continued to boil over into large public protests. On the other, the imposition of a new political constitution and the inevitable influence of all those American troops wandering around had liberalised Japanese society a bit, at least compared to what had gone before. I think it's fair to say some Japanese were happy to see the back of the military regime that had dragged their nation through World War Two, notwithstanding the circumstances.

On the third hand, Japanese interest in American culture wasn't a new thing. It might be possible to chart an increase in American influence in Japanese cinema and, through that, Japanese fashions and lifestyles post-1945, although that's outside the scope of this blog. But one thing I can confidently state is that King Kong (1933) had made a huge impact on Japanese cinema audiences and filmmakers - local imitations such as Japanese King Kong (1933) and King Kong Appears in Edo (1938) had quickly followed, and the RKO original had enjoyed a re-release in Japan in 1953. So that's one of three important factors in the development of Godzilla, Toho's surprise hit of 1954.

The second is that Toho Studios producer Tanaka Tomoyuki had just had a film fall through and needed a quick replacement. He’d been expecting to work on a historical drama shot overseas and co-produced with an Indonesian company, but they’d backed out under public pressure because of ill feeling over Japan’s wartime actions in the area. He’d had a wasted journey to Jakarta to try to change the Indonesian producers’ minds. On the flight back, he thought of capitalising on the popularity of Kong and came up with a proposal that also took in some of the flavour of another hit monster movie, The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953). The Beast hadn’t been released in Japan, but some details of the movie and its success in America were known through the film trade press. Tanaka’s outline revolved around a similar core concept: a reptilian behemoth brought out of hiding by nuclear tests, attacking ships and wading ashore to cause havoc on land.

The third important factor is The Bomb. America had taken control of the Marshall Islands, formerly occupied by Imperial Japan, during the course of the Second World War. They were formally put in charge in July 1947, as administrator of the United Nations' Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, but a full year earlier they’d already tested nuclear weapons on Bikini Atoll. These were plutonium fission implosion devices of a type similar to the one dropped on Nagasaki in August 1945. In March 1954, the US Army went back to Bikini Atoll to test a new variety of two-stage, fusion-fission thermonuclear weapon that employed a combination of heavy hydrogen isotopes and uranium. The test exceeded expectations: the Castle Bravo explosion was measured at 15 megatons, two and a half times the expected yield, lighting up the sky 250 miles away and contaminating more than 7,000 square miles of the surrounding area. A Japanese fishing boat called Daigo Fukuryū Maru (“Lucky Dragon Number Five” – the “Maru” suffix just indicates that it’s a ship’s name) was fishing for tuna 40 miles outside the anticipated danger zone, but was one of several fishing vessels to be showered with radioactive fallout. By the time the boat returned to port two weeks later, the crew were showing severe signs of radiation sickness; one crewman died later that year.

The incident caused an international scandal and was the subject of Shindō Kaneto's biopic film Daigo Fukuryū Maru (1959). By the time that came out, the administrator of the United Nations' Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands had carried out two further series of nuclear tests at Bikini Atoll, in 1956 and 1958. But let’s turn our attention back to 1954.

Tanaka, formulating the idea for a movie with some superficial similarities to the atomic-era cautionary tale The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, commissioned a script treatment from Kayama Shigeru, one of Japan's most popular science fiction authors. Kayama wove this topical bit of news about nuclear testing into his script. Directors Honda (overall/live action) and Tsuburaya (special effects) were brought on board. Honda had strong pacifist leanings and turned the script into something more about and against the war and its aftermath. Tsuburaya was a firm Kong fan and was keen to make a stop-motion monster movie, but that would have been impossible in the time available to him, so Godzilla was instead realised through a combination of miniature models, puppetry and stunt actor Nakajima Haruo wearing a monster costume. Thus a legend was born.

There’s not much I can add to what’s already been said about Godzilla. Its roots in the topical plight of the crew of the Daigo Fukuryū Maru are plainly shown in the opening scenes of ships blasted with light and the surviving fisherman in hospital raving about what he’s seen. Contemporary critics found this tasteless – one of the crewmen of the Daigo Fukuryū Maru had died between the film’s production and its release, and there was a more general concern about playing on the public anxieties over nuclear testing. Nonetheless, the film was a success. Naturally there was a reflex sequel, which we’ll look at next week.

As far as commenting on nuclear testing is concerned, both Godzilla and The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms go there but I think the way Godzilla does it is fundamentally more honest. In The Beast, we see an American team carrying out the test that awakens the titular threat, but it’s being conducted safely away in an uninhabited part of the Arctic circle, and it’s easy for the characters to feel remorse for their part in the nuclear arms race when the monster they’ve unleashed devastates their own homeland. Godzilla comes right out and says: the American tests are happening on our doorstep, and they have a human cost that the Americans won’t feel. (What it doesn’t add is any mention of the Marshall Islanders themselves, whose story is a harrowing one.)

Judging by the example of Dr Serizawa’s sacrifice, the makers of Godzilla also had something pretty pointed to say about how they thought the fathers of the atomic bomb ought to feel.

What I don’t recall seeing anyone else mention before is the very specific imagery of the Oxygen Destroyer as a fantasy super-version of the hydrogen bomb. Like the bomb, it has a spherical chamber inside a larger casing (transparent in this case, so we can see the sphere inside it), but instead of imploding on a payload of fissile material when it’s detonated, the two halves of the Oxygen Destroyer’s inner sphere pop apart. And instead of triggering that implosion with a fusion reaction of isotopic hydrogen, it targets oxygen – the other atomic component of water – and tears it apart. It’s actually a kind of Opposites Day H-Bomb. I find this striking.

The imagery of Godzilla’s assault on Tokyo has some further resonance with Japan’s experience of being firebombed during the Second World War, and the film doesn’t stint on the trauma in showing the survivors cowering during the attack and huddled in makeshift hospitals afterwards. With the exception of Godzilla Minus One (2023), I can’t think of another Godzilla movie that’s presented scenes quite this grim.

No comments:

Post a Comment